Corporatism (a.k.a.Fascism) threatens to produce global ecocide

 by Ron Hart

Benito Mussolini: “”Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.” The war against corporatism is far from over.

In the post below, Tom Engelhardt points out that those individuals responsible for global ecocide–terracide–will escape criminal prosecution under our present laws. ‘Terrarists’ will act with impunity, hiding behind impenetrable corporate shells.

Clearly our laws are not up to the task of protecting life on Earth that is deliberately, actively and knowingly being threatened by terrarists. We have to change the rules.

The Global Campaign to Eradicate Ecocide is designed to fill this gaping hole in our laws. It proposes to make ecocide the Fifth Crime Against Peace under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court alongside the crimes of Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes and Crimes of Aggression.

As proposed, the crime  of Ecocide belongs to jus cogens, which is supreme in the hierarchy of international law and, therefore, it cannot be modified by, or give way to, any rule of international law and does not permit derogation.

Governments embracing corporatism would be unable to subvert the Ecocide Act. To do so, individual politicians would face being dragged to justice by the International Criminal Court. In other words, the Ecocide Act would be a real game-changer.

In a world faced with terracide and with terrarists committed to it, we must quickly put in  place laws to defeat corporatism and terracide.

Benito Mussolini put it this way: “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.”

Our future depends directly on our ability to redefine the role of corporations and our ability to redirect business to embrace commitment to life enhancing activities.

The Biggest Criminal Enterprise in History

by Tom Engelhardtreposted from TomDispatch, May 23, 2013

Terracide and the Terrarists 
Destroying the Planet for Record Profits 
By Tom Engelhardt

We have a word for the conscious slaughter of a racial or ethnic group: genocide.  And one for the conscious destruction of aspects of the environment: ecocide.  But we don’t have a word for the conscious act of destroying the planet we live on, the world as humanity had known it until, historically speaking, late last night.  A possibility might be “terracide” from the Latin word for earth.  It has the right ring, given its similarity to the commonplace danger word of our era: terrorist.

The truth is, whatever we call them, it’s time to talk bluntly about the terrarists of our world.  Yes, I know, 9/11 was horrific.  Almost 3,000 dead, massive towers down, apocalyptic scenes.  And yes, when it comes to terror attacks, the Boston Marathon bombings weren’t pretty either.  But in both cases, those who committed the acts paid for or will pay for their crimes.

In the case of the terrarists — and here I’m referring in particular to the men who run what may be the most profitable corporations on the planet, giant energy companies like ExxonMobilChevronConocoPhillipsBP, and Shell — you’re the one who’s going to pay, especially your children and grandchildren. You can take one thing for granted: not a single terrarist will ever go to jail, and yet they certainly knew what they were doing.

It wasn’t that complicated. In recent years, the companies they run have been extracting fossil fuels from the Earth in ever more frenetic and ingenious ways. The burning of those fossil fuels, in turn, has put record amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. Only this month, the CO2 level reached 400 parts per million for the first time in human history. A consensus of scientists has long concluded that the process was warming the world and that, if the average planetary temperature rose more than two degrees Celsius, all sorts of dangers could ensue, including seas rising high enough to inundate coastal cities, increasingly intense heat waves, droughts, floods, ever more extreme storm systems, and so on.

How to Make Staggering Amounts of Money and Do In the Planet

None of this was exactly a mystery. It’s in the scientific literature. NASA scientist James Hansen first publicized the reality of global warming to Congress in 1988. It took a while — thanks in part to the terrarists — but the news of what was happening increasingly made it into the mainstream. Anybody could learn about it.

Those who run the giant energy corporations knew perfectly well what was going on and could, of course, have read about it in the papers like the rest of us. And what did they do? They put their money into funding think tanks, politicians, foundations, and activists intent on emphasizing “doubts” about the science (since it couldn’t actually be refuted); they and their allies energetically promoted what came to be known as climate denialism. Then they sent their agents and lobbyists and money into the political system to ensure that their plundering ways would not be interfered with. And in the meantime, they redoubled their efforts to get ever tougher and sometimes “dirtier” energy out of the ground in ever tougher and dirtier ways.

The peak oil people hadn’t been wrong when they suggested years ago that we would soon hit a limit in oil production from which decline would follow.  The problem was that they were focused on traditional or “conventional” liquid oil reserves obtained from large reservoirs in easy-to-reach locations on land or near to shore.  Since then, the big energy companies have invested a remarkable amount of time, money, and (if I can use that word) energy in the development of techniques that would allow them to recover previously unrecoverable reserves (sometimes by processes that themselves burn striking amounts of fossil fuels): frackingdeep-water drilling, and tar-sands production, among others. 

They also began to go after huge deposits of what energy expert Michael Klare calls “extreme” or “tough” energy — oil and natural gas that can only be acquired through the application of extreme force or that requires extensive chemical treatment to be usable as a fuel.  In many cases, moreover, the supplies being acquired like heavy oil and tar sands are more carbon-rich than other fuels and emit more greenhouse gases when consumed.  These companies have even begun using climate change itself — in the form of a melting Arctic — to exploit enormous and previously unreachableenergy supplies.  With the imprimatur of the Obama administration, Royal Dutch Shell, for example, has been preparing to test out possible drilling techniques in the treacherous waters off Alaska. MORE

Leave a Reply